Tires Firestone or Nokia

Nokia Tires

I\u2019ve run studded Nokians exclusively now for years. Never going back. What you give up in dry traction you more that make up for on those super hard packed icy days. Especially if you\u2019re running on the highways frequently.

Pros: good on icy days
Cons: less dry traction
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Studded all the way! Had Hakkas on my RAV4 and they made such a difference. They can save your life on black ice.

Pros: made such a difference
Cons: slide on dry asphalt
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

If this is your first time, yes get some studded tires, something like a Hakkapelitta.

Pros: good for new drivers
Cons: loud, studs wear
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

We drive a FWD minivan or a RWD truck - both with good winter tires, Michelin X-ice on the minivan, Nokian Hakkapeliitta LT3 non-studded on the truck.

Pros: good winter tires
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
spleee
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

I had Nokian WRG2s on a car once in the summer. Technically an all-season, but a very very soft all-season. The only thing to note was that under hard braking/cornering they would get squirrelly since the rubber was so soft.

Pros: good traction in rain
Cons: squirrelly under hard braking
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
ThirdeYe1337
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 2.0

I had a set of Ones on my Civic for a short period but swapped them to Continental True Contact Tour 54 instead as they had some very weird vibration and wandering issues.

Cons: weird vibration, wandering issues
Vehicle: Honda Civic
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 ... 103

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...