Tires Firestone or KENDA

Firestone Tires
mcarp22
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

The Indy 500 is slightly better performing, while the RE760 is slightly more comfortable / refined. Which do you prefer? I had a set of the 500s and they were a really good value.

Pros: good value
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires
VR6OOM
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Same tires. Same smiles. Best bang for the buck BY FAR. Dry grip is incredible compared to goodyear eagle f1's and continental sport contact. Not to mention they're inexpensive. I've got 10k miles and they show little signs of wear.

Pros: incredible dry grip, inexpensive
Cons: little signs of wear
Mileage: 10000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires
04lss
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Its been dry, and they have been fairly broken in by now. Steering response is fantastic compared to the old tires. But I have to agree with tire rack that there isn't much feedback. there is definitely more tread noise on the interstate. GRIP, WOW, This things cling harder than an ex girlfriend with abandonment issues. If you can live with a little more harshness its a night and day difference between this tire and the OE contis.

Pros: fantastic steering response, great grip
Cons: more tread noise, more harshness
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

I have a set of Indy 500s mounted to 19" rims on my GLI, been running them since January. Couldn't be happier, they are truly well rounded performance tires. They are awesome on wet roads, they have good acceleration/braking and corner grip. For the price and performance they are a good deal.

Pros: awesome on wet roads, good grip
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires
04lss
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I just had a set of firehawk indy 500 tires installed on my car on monday. I thought i would share my feedback as to how they perform on the car. Steering response... Wow This is so much better. the car is way more willing to turn. there is less delay between the steering wheel and the car moving. Wet traction is a huge step up. Ride. I havent noticed a huge Decline in the ride. Noise, at city speeds the noise has been minimal, no real difference.

Pros: better steering response, huge wet traction
Cons: more tread noise
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
KENDA Tires

Nevegal is a much better choice for cornering than ardent. I've done nevegal front/ardent rear before, but I really would be reluctant to push cornering speed on an ardent up front.

Pros: better choice for cornering
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires
Nate21
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.5

I'm running firestone firehawk Indy 500's. really grippy, and really quite actually

Pros: really grippy, really quiet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
KENDA Tires

In run kenda K35 tires (but not gumwall) and they are ok budget tires. They work well but are not especially light, grippy or puncture-resistant.

Pros: ok budget tires, work well
Cons: not light, not grippy
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
KENDA Tires

I don't know if anyone has had the same experience with the 270, but my Kenda 280s have been awful on wet roads. Like riding on ice... Truly scary. I guess because the rubber compound is cheap. May not be an issue if you live in a dry climate.

Cons: awful on wet roads
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...