Tires Firestone or KENDA

Firestone Tires

I had a set of Indy500; they performed well for a UHP for the price, but definitely noticeable difference with the set of Conti ExtremeContact Sport 02s that replaced them.

Pros: performed well for price
Cons: noticeable difference
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires
icenver
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.5

General G-Max RS or Firestone Indy 500s are solid options aswell with good grip and way friendlier pricing. I ran Indy 500s on my old Camaro and they felt great in normal driving without being loud or sketchy in the rain.

Pros: good grip, friendlier pricing
Cons: not loud or sketchy
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

Those are good tires but way too heavy at 44lbs vs 24lbs for stock tires.They will kill your mileage and performance. I went with Firestone destination at2 in 235/65 r17. Only a few pounds more (28lbs) than stock and they perform great!

Pros: perform great
Cons: way too heavy
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
KENDA Tires
mikewinddale
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I will add that I saw that Consumer Reports gave a surprisingly good review of the Kenda Vezda Touring 4S.

Dry braking: 4/5

Wet braking: 3/5

Handling: 3/5

Hydroplaning: 3/5

Snow traction: 4/5

Ice braking: 4/5

Ride comfort: 3/5

Noise: 4/5

Rolling resistance: 3/5

Tested tread life (Miles): 50000

Verdict: "Pros: Impressive snow and ice grip as well as dry braking performance. Cons: 50,000 mile projected tread life based on CR's test is so-so. CR's Take: A great choice if winter traction is a priority."

Pros: Impressive snow, ice grip
Cons: so-so tread life
Mileage: 50000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

Decided on Firestone Affinity. Firestone's higher level brand, Bridgestone's research and development has trickled down to the Affinity AS tires. You can save some money by avoiding the Bridgestones. But 6 months in, with the amount of snow in Chicago this winter, all I can say is I haven't regretted my choice whatsoever.

Pros: no regrets, good in snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
KENDA Tires

I cant speak for the K657 specifically, but I ran a Kenda K761 rear on my CM400. I found that the Kenda tire chipped and fragmented really easily but otherwise was just an OK tire.

Pros: OK tire
Cons: chipped and fragmented easily
Vehicle: Honda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

I went to them for new tires on my Hyundai, my car had 96k on the originals, the wear was even and they still had decent tread. Guess what, they said I needed alignment.

Pros: even tire wear
Cons: unnecessary alignment
Vehicle: Hyundai
Mileage: 96000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires
w1ck3d_ham
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

I had the Firestone AT years ago on a Ranger. Complete trash! Didn’t last for shit & barely any off-road traction.

Pros: none
Cons: complete trash
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 46

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...