Tires Firestone or KENDA

KENDA Tires
segoii
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I am using the Kenda Wintergen 2 on a Mazda CX3 and it's good. Way more silent than the original Toyo R52 summer tires. And it's okay in the wet too. I'm driving it the 4th year now and they are definitely not worse than the Toyos in the wet.

Pros: more silent than Toyo
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires
oneupdouchebag
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I currently have Firehawk AS V2's on mine. I live in an area that gets all four seasons, and they've served me well in the rain and snow/ice. I'm sure I'm sacrificing some summer performance, but that's pretty far from my priority. No issues with excessive wear or tire noise

Pros: good in rain, snow
Cons: sacrificing summer performance
Vehicle: Mazda 6
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

My wife bought a car from carvana and i noticed on delivery that the tires were at the wear bars. Took it to Firestone, they filed a claim with SR on the spot and had new tires in a couple of hours. Can’t complain about that.

Pros: new tires in hours
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

Looks fine other than it’s wet and has other people’s rubber on it. You’re gonna find out that the Indy 500 is not a track tire. So when you push really really hard, it’s gonna get really greasy and loose very quickly.

Cons: greasy and loose
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires
volvo1
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

I wanted to write this because there are almost no reviews on this tire online. Firestone claims it's a big improvement over the previous generation. Traction is good on wet and dry roads. Slippage prediction is also decent. Road noise is fine. Ride comfort (in terms of feeling the road) is really good. Steering responsiveness is ABYSMAL. It's like driving an aquarium on top of a trampoline. Due to the fact the sidewall seems to be made of marshmallows, it's quite terrifying doing any aggressive driving. Highway driving, making turns specifically, is terrifying. Overall: Do not buy unless it's for rears only, or you're driving a car that is exceptionally light weight. If the steering and body movement responsiveness was fixed, this would be an excellent tire. Sadly the responsiveness is so bad, the tire feels legitimately dangerous.

Pros: good traction, decent slippage prediction
Cons: abysmal steering responsiveness
Vehicle: Infiniti
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
KENDA Tires

I bought a $500 bike (Scott Sub Cross 50) for my kid. Comes with Kenda Booster tires. On 2nd day of commute to school, tire ripped at the middle seam, around 3 inches long.

Pros: tire ripped
Cons: manufacturing defect
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... 46

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...