Tires Falken or OEM Honda

Falken Tires
Morgothic
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

I have the Falkens and I couldn't be happier with them. I've been able to use them on dry road, wet road, sand and rocks and they just grip. And they're quieter on the highway than the Goodyear Wranglers they replaced.

Pros: great grip, quieter on highway
Cons: null
Vehicle: Jeep
Mileage: 9656 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
spac83
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

I put Falken Wildpeak 235's on my '09 Liberty back in April and I'm really happy with them. Great traction off-road and quiet enough to be my daily drive. Would highly recommend them.

Pros: great traction off-road
Cons: null
Vehicle: Jeep
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
dreamtank
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Wow great work man thanks! I have Falken FK510 tires on my S. FWIW, excellent tire but holy shit was I surprised to see the rears were almost bald after 1 summer. (About 10000 kms)

Pros: excellent tire
Cons: rears almost bald
Mileage: 10000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I had the Falken Azenis on my S, I liked them. Great value summer tire and I don’t need no stinking snow grip here in Phoenix.

Pros: great value, summer tire
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

What a relief! Thanks to your chart, I see that I won't need to fork $329 per tire to replace the MICHELIN PILOT SPORT 4S mounted on my Model 3 Performance. It looks like the AZENIS FK510 will do the same job for a bit more than half the price of the Michelin!

Pros: cheaper than Michelin
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
Kingobadiah
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I got falken sincera tires for my 15 fit and 13 Yaris. No issuues and they were cheap and high mileage rated. I recall on my Yaris they took a little getting used to as the sidewalls seemed to have more play but with the Honda they felt just like the ones that came new with my car.

Pros: cheap, high mileage rated
Cons: sidewalls seemed to have play
Vehicle: Honda Fit
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I'd use the OEM Falken Sincera’s. This is because I read this review: "So far I have had no flats or problems with the OEM Falken Sincera’s other than being a bit noisy. They have done ok in the DC area weather where we get little snow and I think 40K for tread wear isn’t too bad."

Pros: no flats, ok weather
Cons: a bit noisy
Mileage: 40000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
johnnyhowell
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 3.0

Around Thanksgiving last year, I had two Michelin MXV4 Eco+ OEM stock tires that were worn and need of replacing. I followed suggestions of colleagues and Consumer Reports and bought two Falken Ziex ZE-512, and installed them on the front of my 1998.5 Turbo Passat Wagon. Although I kept the same size (195/65/R15) I was impressed immediately: much better handling, steering response, road feel, as well as seriously improved wet and dry grip. Extremely stable at 90mph+ speeds, and good cornering. After about 1000 miles however, I thought I had front-end or transmission problems, as there was this terrible WHOO=WHOO sound coming from the front. I took it to a shop and they said no trouble, just tire noise. Noise worsened, so took to VW dealer in Maine while on the road; they said that car was aligned perfectly per spec, but Falken tires were \"cupped\", and worn on the inside.

Pros: better handling, improved grip
Cons: excessive tire noise, cupped
Mileage: 1609 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
eunos94
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 1.0

Falken ZIEX 912 is the most over hyped tire I've ever had the misfortune of having mounted to my vehicle. Useless in the rain, greasy in the cold and noisy as hell as they begin to wear.

Pros: none
Cons: useless in rain, noisy
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 ... 95

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...