Tires Falken or BRIDGESTONE

BRIDGESTONE Tires

The Blizzaks always performed better, in my experience, and my WS90s have lasted just fine. I’m not sure how they’d be considered bad on dry roads, can’t say I’ve had any issues.

Pros: superior performance, good longevity, no issues on dry roads
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I’ve got blizzaks on both vehicles. Only ran generic winter tires before that and the improvement was crazy.

Pros: significant improvement, excellent performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
SnowmanJPS
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I had blizzaks that I bought used on Kijiji for my outback I had, the previous person had them for 3 winters, and I also had them for 3 winters and there was still probably another winter left in them if you wanted to chance it, I didn’t have any issues with them, maybe a little rough but they were also on steel wheels

Pros: excellent longevity, no issues
Cons: a little rough
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
p1th3cus
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

I had Falkens before, only lasted like 20k miles. Too early to tell how good these will be, ride and road noise about the same.

Pros: ride and road noise same
Cons: only lasted 20k miles
Mileage: 32186 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
mjh4
  • Grip:
Rating 1.0

We had heavy snow and ice this week where I live, and I am thoroughly unimpressed with the stock Falken Ziex tires on our 2024 Forester. Terrible traction in the snow. They are also wearing way faster than any other tires I've owned.

Pros: null
Cons: terrible traction, wearing fast
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ... 184

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...