Tires Falken or BRIDGESTONE

Falken Tires

I’ve been liking my wildpeaks at4s. Haven’t had damage off-roading only puncture I’ve had was a roof nail on the road.

Pros: good off-roading durability
Cons: vulnerable to road nails
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I have the same tires. On smaller aftermarket rims but they’ve been a great tire. I’ll get the same tires again this spring.

Pros: great tire
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

One of my stock tires finally decided to kick the bucket, so I replaced them with a set of Falken Wildpeak A/T Trails. So far I like them, they’re the same size as the stock tires, but the handling is superb (especially in rain and on gravel). A little more road noise and a bit of reduction in gas mileage, but I’m cool with it.

Pros: superb handling, good in rain and gravel
Cons: more road noise, reduced gas mileage
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I went with Wildpeak AT Trail because highway driving is my priority, with occasional drives on the beach and gentle Forest Service roads. I see a lot of soft-roading in this sub-reddit they can handle.

Pros: good for highway, handles beach/trails
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I recommend the Bridgestone Blizzak. They are studless snow tires. Instead of medal studs, they embed a series of really firm rubber 'studs' into the softer rubber of the tire. They work just as well as metal studded tires, but don't chew up the road or make the annoying noise that the metal studs.

Pros: work just as well
Cons: annoying noise
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I've only tried one set so far. Falken azenis RT 660+. So far they are awesome. They are almost too sticky tbh. There is a intersection i like to slide through and with these I have to really stay in throttle hard to get it going or small clutch kick helps.

Pros: awesome, very sticky
Cons: almost too sticky
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
NoctD
  • Grip:
Rating 2.5

The Bridgestones aren't terri-bad but I'll be happy when it comes time to swap them out for some DWS06+ instead.

Cons: not terri-bad
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

Just got some Falken Azenis A/S 460, only got about 8500 miles out of the previous pair. My current energy use skyrocketed to 350 Wh/mi.

Pros: null
Cons: energy use skyrocketed
Mileage: 8500 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

That’s very interesting. My limited trim came with the falken tire which is even worse. It’s gone at 22k. Yokohama in my experience is pretty good

Cons: worse, gone at 22k
Mileage: 22000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 ... 184

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...