Tires Falken or BRIDGESTONE

BRIDGESTONE Tires

Tried xice and blizzak ws90 both brand new. I preferred blizzak it made me more confident to drive in snow than xice my car is fwd.

Pros: more confident in snow
Cons: none
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
SirRolex
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Wildpeak AT4Ws, 255/85r16s, never go back. True 33s, no modifications needed to the truck at all. They are beasts in the snow and ice, I wouldn't even worry about having true snow tires with them honestly. They have crushed two Northern Michigan winters in a row now.

Pros: beasts in snow and ice
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
adventure_pup
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I ran the Toyo ATIIIs on my Tacoma and they worked almost as well as my Blizzaks I have on my Outback. But doing it again is get Wildpeaks, which a ton of my friends have, far quieter ride.

Pros: quieter ride
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I have Blizzaks and compared to true studded winter tires like Nokian they are not on the same level. But if you dont have ice and snow all the time they have good wet grip.

Pros: good wet grip
Cons: not on same level
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

My wildpeaks only lasted a little over 18k miles or 30,000km

I felt they were more of an aggressive appearing road tyre

I had the AT3s, definitely the opposite experience in my case as I don't recommend them unless you spend most of ur time on pavement

but left me unimpressed

Cons: lasted only 30,000km, more of a road tire, not recommended for off-pavement, unimpressed
Vehicle: Toyota
Mileage: 30000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 184

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...