Tires Falken or BRIDGESTONE

Falken Tires
Ghostx187
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

285/70R18 Falken Wildpeak R/T01 tires measuring 34” on Discount Tire’s website, clear with no front, rear or UCA rubbing or contact on stock suspension and wheels.

Pros: no rubbing or contact
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

My old ram came with old all terrains. Took it to the shop in 4hi and granny driving. Installed some blizzaks dvm2s and never put it in 4 again for the rest of the winter.

Pros: never put in 4 again
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

On my NA, Bridgestone RE71RS. They were like $805 including 3 year roadhazard full replacement from Discount Tire out the door. Matched costco. 205/50/15

Pros: full replacement
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I use the Falken RT660+ on my NC during Race Season/Non Winter.

Really fun grippy tires, and are only $180 a tire in a 225/45/17 last I checked. They will drive in the rain just fine as long as there is not standing water (puddles) as well.

I daily on them and autocross on them during the warmer months

Pros: fun grippy tires
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
viejobbia
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

For that New England -> Montana winter highway run, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W is honestly the safest all-terrain you can throw on a Tacoma without going full snow tire. They bite way better on packed snow/ice than KO3s and stay stable at highway speeds.

Pros: safest all-terrain
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

My Blizzaks on my STi today were awesome. I love these driving days to put them to good use!

Pros: awesome driving experience
Cons: none
Vehicle: Subaru Impreza WRX
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
chrfr
  • Grip:
Rating 3.0

I've used Nokians for years but tried Blizzak WS-90s this time around because they were a fair bit less expensive. They seem fine but seem to have noticeably more rolling resistance than the Nokian, and I notice it's easier to spin them starting up on dry pavement in cold weather than I'd experienced with Nokian in the past. I'll be switching back to whatever Hakkapeliitta is current once these are worn out.

Pros: less expensive
Cons: more rolling resistance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I had the Bridgestones on my Mk7.5 GTI and was very unhappy with them. When it was time to change tires (after only 12,000 miles) I went with the Michelin PSAS4 I was blown away by how much better they were.

Pros: Michelin much better
Cons: very unhappy
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 12000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

Stock tires on my CrossTrek were Ziex Falkens and were done by 30k. But stock tires are crap for the most part

Cons: short lifespan, poor quality
Vehicle: Subaru
Mileage: 48280 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... 184

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...