Tires Continental or BRIDGESTONE

Continental Tires

IME/FWIW front to back & side to side is fine w/ the DWS06+ although never really had too much of a difference in wear side to side over many sets of them on several vehicles. Front to back has been the biggest difference in wear on my Mk 6, 8.5V S3, Alltrack, & Mk 7.5.

Pros: fine front to back
Cons: wear side to side
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Continental Tires

I have always been a fan of Continental. I put control contact SRS+ tires on mine via Discount Tire. About 900 for 4 new ones with install and lifetime rotation/balance and replacement certs

Pros: fan of Continental
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Continental Tires

Najskuplje nije nuzno najbolje ali za Conti tvrdim da vrijedi svake lipe. Imam auto od skoro 2ipo tone i 20 cola gume. Nenadjebive. Kisa, snijeg, blato... u name it

Pros: vrijedi svake lipe, nenadmašne performanse
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Continental Tires

Love the tires and I have zero use for all season tires in Southern California. However, car is no longer tracked and these were much cheaper than Michelins I used for decades.

Pros: love the tires, much cheaper
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

My R came from the factory with the Bridgestone Potenza S005s. They're decent for daily driving—good grip in the dry and pretty quiet—but they’re not amazing in the wet.

Pros: good grip in the dry, pretty quiet
Cons: not amazing in wet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
Pokhgr
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Ya, I have Weatherpeaks on my 2013 Avalon. 29,000 miles and they are at 2/32. They have less than 100 miles of gravel use as well. I cannot recommend them.

Cons: wears very quickly
Vehicle: Toyota Avalon
Mileage: 46671 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 ... 239

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...