Tires BRIDGESTONE or Vredestein

BRIDGESTONE Tires

Bought a set of Blizzak WS90s two years ago and they have tons of tread left after two seasons. Wear obviously depends on how you drive, but mine have held up great for regular commuting and trips to the valley. Very good at handling deep snow, never got stuck.

Pros: excellent tread life, durable, very good in deep snow, never got stuck
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

The Blizzaks always performed better, in my experience, and my WS90s have lasted just fine. I’m not sure how they’d be considered bad on dry roads, can’t say I’ve had any issues.

Pros: superior performance, good longevity, no issues on dry roads
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I’ve got blizzaks on both vehicles. Only ran generic winter tires before that and the improvement was crazy.

Pros: significant improvement, excellent performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

TLDR; I had to replace my Bridgestone Weatherpeaks within 5 months and 7,000 miles with 2 tire rotations and balances in between. I opted to go with Michelin instead.

Cons: unusual tread wear
Mileage: 7000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
krudmuphin
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 1.0

I've had my Mazda 3 turbo for 20k miles now and in that time, 2 of the Turanza tires had sidewall bubbles that compromised them. Not to mention, they are just noisy and feel like they have pretty lame grip. They are not confidence-inspiring at all and suck in the cold.

Cons: noisy, lame grip
Vehicle: Mazda 3
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 ... 122

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...