Tires BRIDGESTONE or TIGAR

PartReview Score

Rank #5 in ranking

1551

667

150

915

3.9

Grip

4.0

Noise

3.5

Ride comfort

3.4

Owners' choice:

PR Score

Ranking

Votes

Reviews

Average rating

Properties

Car

PartReview Score

Rank #52 in ranking

3.3

Grip

3.4

Ride comfort

2.5

No data

Reviews

All

BRIDGESTONE

TIGAR

BRIDGESTONE › Tires

ADVNTURR 10 Jan 2025, 19:57

Rating 4.0

Since they're now legal in my class I'll probably give them a try later this season after my current Bridgestone RE-71RSs are done

Vehicle: Nissan

BRIDGESTONE › Tires

VnEMr 10 Jan 2025, 00:14

Grip:

Rating 5.0

Blizzacks are the best.

BRIDGESTONE › Tires

Cool-Bunch6645 9 Jan 2025, 15:01

Grip:

Rating 4.5

I went from the stock Primacy to Bridgestone Potenza sports (300tw) and the difference in grip is absolutely noticeable and worth it.

Pros: noticeable grip difference

Cons: worth it

BRIDGESTONE › Tires

HonMaguro 7 Jan 2025, 07:43

Grip:
Ride comfort:

Rating 4.0

I just replaced my stock Dunlop with Bridgestone Turanza 6 three days ago and they felt great.

Pros: felt great

BRIDGESTONE › Tires

Silver_Molasses6302 7 Jan 2025, 07:11

Rating 4.0

For winter tires I'm using Bridgestone Blizzak WS90.

BRIDGESTONE › Tires

EddieRyanDC 7 Jan 2025, 05:36

Rating 4.0

I have Bridgestone Blizzaks.

BRIDGESTONE › Tires

D3t0_vsu 6 Jan 2025, 15:43

Grip:
Noise:
Ride comfort:

Rating 4.0

I got myself bridgestone blizzak lm005 winter tired, so far no complains.

Pros: no complains

BRIDGESTONE › Tires

ALOHA_HI_808 18 Oct 2024, 01:32

Grip:

Rating 3.0

Bridgestone Alenza Ultra’s for me. Michelin defenders wear out too fast for some reason and I don’t have a heavy foot. While the Crossclimate tires are awesome, they impact MPG too much.

Pros: awesome tires

Cons: impact MPG too much

BRIDGESTONE › Tires

dericn 28 Apr 2024, 18:19

Grip:
Ride comfort:

Rating 1.0

I gave up and replaced them all at 12K miles after the second blowout. Plus they ride and handle so much better than those shitty Turanzas.

Pros: better ride, better handling

Cons: shitty ride, blowouts

Vehicle: Mazda 3

Mileage: 19312 km

BRIDGESTONE › Tires

chloroxane 5 Feb 2024, 05:37

Grip:
Noise:

Rating 1.0

These tires are awful on my car. They're not performance tires by an means. They're meant to be driven and babied like a granny. In snow, you'd have to drive 30 km/hr or else it'll start sliding. In rain, it'll hydroplane after 90 km/hr. And in dry condition, it's adequate but loud on highways.

Pros: adequate in dry condition

Cons: awful, loud, hydroplane