Tires BRIDGESTONE or Nokia

BRIDGESTONE Tires
ferrymanken
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I bought 4 new Bridgestone Turanzas the next day and it was like driving a completely different car.

Pros: driving a different car
Cons: cheap tires frightening in wet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Maiinput ko lang ung meron ako. Hilux reliable. Change oils and filters, battery, brake pads at goma pa lang ginagawa ko sa 100k. Sa takbo kung ano sya day 1 ganun pa din hanggang ngayon.

Pros: reliable, peace of mind
Cons: mahal ng maintenance
Mileage: 100000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Been running Nokian’s several years now. They are winter rated ( not all seasons) don’t change them at all . 30,000 now still pretty ok .

Pros: winter rated
Cons: still pretty ok
Mileage: 30000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I run studded Blizzak Snow tires in the winter and K02's in the summer. My winter tires are smaller and narrower, look funny too, but out perform my summer tires all day long.

Pros: outperform summer tires
Cons: look funny
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
buhlot
  • Noise:
Rating 3.0

I have the same noise with the Nokians compared to my outgoing Yokohama Geolandar G015 AT tires. My Yokohamas were dead silent in comparison.

Pros: performed as expected
Cons: same noise
Vehicle: Lexus
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I had the Bridgestones on my Mk7.5 GTI and was very unhappy with them. When it was time to change tires (after only 12,000 miles) I went with the Michelin PSAS4 I was blown away by how much better they were.

Pros: Michelin much better
Cons: very unhappy
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 12000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 162

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...