Tires BRIDGESTONE or Nokia

Nokia Tires

I put Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5’s on my wife’s Blazer EV AWD. Even with the AWD, the standard ultra low rolling resistance tires it came with were horrible in the snow and these made a word of difference. I/we are actually confident driving the Blazer in the snow now.

Pros: confident driving in snow
Cons: standard tires horrible
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

If you end up choosing real winters then Blizzaks or X-Ice genuinely transform the car as I ran Blizzaks on my old RWD coupe when I lived near Ann Arbor and it went from borderline undriveable to genuinely confident on unplowed roads.

Pros: genuinely confident on roads
Cons: borderline undriveable
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I've been impressed with my Nokian NAT Outposts this year. _Plenty_ of offroad traction, 3 peak rated, and they're lighter than Falkens.

Pros: plenty offroad traction, lighter
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Fui representante Bridgestone durante 5 anos. Isso se chama pneu desagregado. O que ocorre \u00e9 que a malha interna se solta, criando um ponto de deslocamento entre a borracha de revestimento exterior e a borracha mais profunda, geralmente ocasionando essa deformidade.

Cons: pneu desagregado
Vehicle: Ford Focus
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
DirtyDan40
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Our new 2025 CRV needed 4 new tires at only 9k miles. All 4 tires were cupped and fraying despite looking new. Felt and sounded like I was driving a helicopter.

Cons: tires cupped and fraying
Vehicle: Honda
Mileage: 14484 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 162

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...