Tires BRIDGESTONE or Nokia

Nokia Tires
tatecg
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I’ve had 22” Nokians on my R1S for 8,000 miles, and noticed no difference in efficiency. I *have* noticed (as have others) that they have significantly more tread than the stock Pirellis at this same point. Given their cost, any increase in “fuel” costs due to worse efficiency (if that is a thing) will probably be more than made up for by the lower cost of the tires, and the (likely) longer useable life.

Pros: no efficiency difference, more tread, lower cost, longer life
Mileage: 12875 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I like the Bridgestone Alenza AS ultras so far, but damn are they loud!! I have a 2018 F150 and they are so loud! Hopefully that will improve with some wear.

Pros: like the tire
Cons: damn are they loud
Vehicle: Ford
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
Technical-Count-7041
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Dès le 1er jour, j'ai observé plusieurs vibrations, autant à 50-60km/h que sur l'autoroute, en tournant le volant, en freinant, etc. Je n'avais aucun problème avant la pose de ces nouveaux pneus d'hiver.

Cons: plusieurs vibrations
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 ... 162

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...