Tires BRIDGESTONE or NANKANG

BRIDGESTONE Tires

My car came with the Toyos and they lasted one summer, in the winter I run Blizzaks. Summer 2012 and 2013 I ran Potenza RE-11s. These has spent 3 weekends at Tail of the Dragon in that time and still have tread left on them to get me into next season and they are stickier than the Toyo Proxes and about $100 per tire cheaper.

Pros: stickier than Toyo Proxes, cheaper
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I'm personally very happy with my Bridestone Pole Position RE960AS tires. (Way better than the Goodyear Eagle LS's the car came with) They withstood several trips to the track this summer, and seriously outperformed anyone there when it was wet out.

Pros: outperformed when wet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I live in Langley. I run Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 which work great for the amount of snow we get, while still being a decent performance tire.

Pros: decent performance tire
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

My Pirellis got very noisy at 20K and were badly cupped by 30K. I wouldn't recommend replacing them with another set of the same tire. I put Bridgestone RE 970AS Pole Positions on my GTI and have been very happy with them so far. They had the highest ratings on Tire Rack, just edging out the Conti Extreme Contacts.

Pros: very happy
Cons: noisy, badly cupped
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 20000 km
Part number: RE 970AS
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I've always just used Blizzak WS-50's but they do have a squishy sidewall. The Blizzak WS-60 or Revo 01 is a lot better. The Nokian Hakkapelliita's have a better sidewall too.

Pros: better sidewall (WS-60, Revo 01, Hakkapelliita)
Cons: squishy sidewall (WS-50)
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 ... 107

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...