Got it
We use cookies to collect statistics and improve your experience. Learn more.
Spare parts reviews ➔ All comparisons ➔ BRIDGESTONE ➔ NANKANG Page 38

Tires BRIDGESTONE or NANKANG

Reviews
All
BRIDGESTONE
NANKANG
NANKANG › Tires
SeeYouSoonSpoon
  • Grip:
Rating 4.5

That being said, the CR-S is an incredible tire if your focus is driving on dry tracks. I found wear to be good with very consistent laptimes, it doesn‘t overheat easily, which is something I very much enjoy. Being able to push for many laps with the tire staying consistent and predictable is quite a treat if you ask me. Performance in the wet however isn‘t really good.

Pros: consistent laptimes, doesn't overheat
Cons: performance in wet bad
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE › Tires
NorthofNormal2015
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I was looking at the AT4's but went with Bridgestone Dueler A/T Revo 3s and they been really good in the snow. Also nice and quiet, on a big ole SUV

Pros: good in the snow
Cons: nice and quiet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
NANKANG › Tires
KenJyi30
  • Grip:
Rating 3.0

The crs were a bit pricey and didnt last long but they’re noticeable higher grip

Pros: noticeable higher grip
Cons: bit pricey, didnt last
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE › Tires
towerrh
  • Grip:
Rating 2.0

They are garbo. I got 30k out of my turanzas before I had to get new ones. I went with the Michilin Cross Climate 2. Totally worth it.

Pros: Totally worth it
Cons: garbo, only 30k miles
Mileage: 30000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ... 107

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
VS

Tires MICHELIN or Continental

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Falken

VS

Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Goodyear

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Hankook

VS

Tires MICHELIN or YOKOHAMA

Show all
Loading...
›