Tires BRIDGESTONE or MRF

BRIDGESTONE Tires

I went from the stock Primacy to Bridgestone Potenza sports (300tw) and the difference in grip is absolutely noticeable and worth it.

Pros: noticeable grip difference
Cons: worth it
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Went with Bridgestone RE-71RS set. Paid $950 USD for set of four from Tire Rack in October and paid to have them heat cycled by them.

So far: 1198 street miles, 4 days of Autocross with 46 runs on them.

Pros: 4 days of Autocross
Mileage: 1198 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

The Bridgestone A005 is less highly regarded in the snow and more for wet and cold (i.e Scotland), but both are miles and miles clear of a summer tyre in the snow.

Pros: good for wet, cold
Cons: poor snow performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

TLDR; I had to replace my Bridgestone Weatherpeaks within 5 months and 7,000 miles with 2 tire rotations and balances in between. I opted to go with Michelin instead.

Cons: unusual tread wear
Mileage: 7000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
krudmuphin
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 1.0

I've had my Mazda 3 turbo for 20k miles now and in that time, 2 of the Turanza tires had sidewall bubbles that compromised them. Not to mention, they are just noisy and feel like they have pretty lame grip. They are not confidence-inspiring at all and suck in the cold.

Cons: noisy, lame grip
Vehicle: Mazda 3
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ... 97

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...