Got it
We use cookies to collect statistics and improve your experience. Learn more.
Spare parts reviews ➔ All comparisons ➔ BRIDGESTONE ➔ Laufenn

Tires BRIDGESTONE or Laufenn

Reviews
All
BRIDGESTONE
Laufenn
Laufenn › Tires
dpkant
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

I am using laufen s fit as on my 2023 MY dual.. it cost me 108usd per /tire got it at AMERICAS TIRE. I agree woth others on foam padding but i am least bothered bout it. Performace wise i see no difference in regular day to day driving. Infact have performed well in snow as well.. i am happy with it running almost 2k miles till now.

Pros: performed well in snow
Cons: foam padding bothered
Mileage: 3218 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE › Tires
Lathejockey81
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

Blizzak is the king for studless snow traction, I think Michelin X-Ice is a little better on ice, Continental VikingContact is another great option for a little less $$$. I'm currently on Vredestein Wintrac+ (something like that) and they're fine.

Pros: good snow traction
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE › Tires
LateExplorer3780
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I\u2019ve had the Bridgestone S23 and they lastet 3k miles. Best 3k miles I\u2019ve ridden but def not the best mileage.

Pros: best miles ridden
Cons: not best mileage
Mileage: 4828 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE › Tires
Stereosun
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

After switching to Bridgestone Weatherpeak All-Weather tires i get 8.1 as the lowest. 29-30MPG.

Pros: good fuel economy
Cons: lower MPG in winter
Vehicle: Honda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE › Tires
rcman57
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

Pirelli Rosso IV's or Bridgestone S23 are probably the best 2 sport focused tires on the market right now that arent sports touring like the Mich Road 6's. I have S23's on my MT09 (came stock, and have since been replaced with a new set)

Pros: sport focused tires
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE › Tires
Humbugwombat
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

Your best mileage will come from a low rolling resistance tire. I use Ecopias by Bridgestone. I had Weatherpeaks on before that and had noticeably worse fuel efficiency (8-10 mpg difference.)

Pros: best mileage, low resistance
Cons: worse fuel efficiency
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 101

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
VS

Tires MICHELIN or Continental

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Falken

VS

Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Goodyear

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Hankook

VS

Tires MICHELIN or YOKOHAMA

Show all

Which tires to choose — BRIDGESTONE or Laufenn?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires BRIDGESTONE and Laufenn
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — Laufenn or BRIDGESTONE?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires BRIDGESTONE were overall better than Laufenn.

  1. BRIDGESTONE received a PR Score of 77 out of 100, and Laufenn scored 69 points.
  2. BRIDGESTONE ranked 5 in the overall ranking, and Laufenn ranked 28.
  3. The average rating is higher for BRIDGESTONE (3.9) than for Laufenn (3.6).
  4. Tires BRIDGESTONE have better feature ratings than Laufenn:
    • Noise - owners believe, that this property for BRIDGESTONE is better than Laufenn.
    • Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for Laufenn is outperforms BRIDGESTONE.
    • Grip - reviews suggest, that this property for BRIDGESTONE is preferred to Laufenn.

Which tires are more popular — BRIDGESTONE or Laufenn?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires BRIDGESTONE were overall more popular than Laufenn.

By vote balance, tires BRIDGESTONE surpassed Laufenn:

  • For BRIDGESTONE, the ratio of positive (2197) to negative (646) votes is 1551 vote.
  • For Laufenn, the ratio of positive (195) to negative (84) votes is 111 votes.

By number of reviews, tires BRIDGESTONE surpassed Laufenn:

  • For tires BRIDGESTONE there are 915 reviews: 667 positive, 98 neutral, 150 negative.
  • For tires Laufenn there are 86 reviews: 51 positive, 21 neutral, 14 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — BRIDGESTONE or Laufenn?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires BRIDGESTONE led more car-specific ratings than Laufenn:

BRIDGESTONE are chosen by owners of cars such as: Audi S6, Chevrolet Impala, Ford Expedition, Toyota Hilux, Toyota Supra, Toyota Vios, Volkswagen Touareg, and others.

Tires Laufenn have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires BRIDGESTONE with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo, Kumho.

Also available: comparisons of tires Laufenn with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo, Kumho.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...
›