Tires BRIDGESTONE or KENDA

KENDA Tires

If you go with the cheaper of the two options, get the Kenda Kozmik's. They're similar to the Michelin City Grips and have the same dual compound tread. I've never had any problems with them and they've lasted well over 6000 miles, they hold the road in wet weather and do okay in light snow.

Pros: hold the road, lasted well
Mileage: 9656 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
mstrjon32
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I just put these on our Commodore in 245/45R18. They replaced a set of Bridgestone Potenza RE003's. Initial impression is that they aren't any noisier than the Potenza's, possibly a bit quieter. Haven't driven in a heavy rain yet but the performance on slick roads was also good. My biggest concern is that they were going to totally spoil the handling but cornering at civilised speeds is still satisfying. Certainly they don't have anywhere near the dry grip of the Potenza's but they're fine for everyday use.

Pros: good performance on slick roads
Cons: less dry grip
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
KENDA Tires

Kenda tyres also in Australia and these aren’t a cheap crappy brand. The R/T & M/T have a very durable casing and are good value for money

Pros: durable casing, good value
Cons: aren't cheap, crappy brand
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
KENDA Tires

Kenda kraiser KR20As are a great tire, wear kinda fast, but cheap to replace makes a good difference, or federal 595rs RR love this tire hooks all the time for me

Pros: hooks all the time
Cons: wear kinda fast
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
Wadical1
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

They ride great, have great traction in wet weather and do not seem to exhibit excessive wear. Well priced compared to Bridgestones and I have no complaints.

Pros: great ride, great traction
Cons: excessive wear
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
CTYankeeinMO_1986
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Bridgestone Turanza Quiettracks. Rock. (A huge improvement vs OEM Michelin Energy Saver A/S tires.) Based on my past experience with this and other Michelin tires, not entirely sold on the Michelin brand.

Pros: huge improvement
Cons: not sold on Michelin
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
Remarkable-One7904
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I've been driving all types of vehicles on all types of tires for more than 50 years. The two best value tires I ever owned were Douglas (identical tread and design as my original Pirelli P77's) on an AWD Volkswagon Quantum and a set of Bridgestone Turanzas on a Mitsubishi Diamante (smooth and quiet as driving on glass). Both of these tires gave me over 52,000 miles of excellent service.

Pros: smooth and quiet
Vehicle: Mitsubishi Diamante
Mileage: 52000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
rkj__
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 3.0

I’ve driven a wide variety of winter tires. Bridgestone, GoodYear, Firestone, Cooper, Michelin, Continental, and one or two others. Some were quieter, some were better on ice, some were better in deep snow. None were terrible. If you go with major brand names, that are not much over 5 years old, you should be ok.

Pros: quieter, better on ice
Cons: none were terrible
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I've had my cx-30 for a little over 6 months. The tires are mediocre at best. I haven't been in the snow yet, but they aren't that good in the rain. They seem to be a good fair weather tire and that's about it.

Pros: good fair weather tire
Cons: mediocre at best
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 ... 105

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...