Tires BRIDGESTONE or KENDA

KENDA Tires

Idk what these people above are talking about kenda vezda UHP A/S being bad. To me they feel 98% like a michelin pilot sport a/s or even a Conti A/S just at half the price of those tires. Cant beat em in my opinion, im on my 2nd set on my Elantra N

Pros: good value, great performance
Cons: feel like Michelin/Conti
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
KENDA Tires
sagaiswara
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

My dad put Kendas on his car (from Hyperdrive) and has been very happy with them. Good durable value from a pretty reputable Taiwanese brand.

Pros: good durable value
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Bridgestone Alenza Ultra’s for me. Michelin defenders wear out too fast for some reason and I don’t have a heavy foot. While the Crossclimate tires are awesome, they impact MPG too much.

Pros: awesome tires
Cons: impact MPG too much
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

TLDR; I had to replace my Bridgestone Weatherpeaks within 5 months and 7,000 miles with 2 tire rotations and balances in between. I opted to go with Michelin instead.

Cons: unusual tread wear
Mileage: 7000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
krudmuphin
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 1.0

I've had my Mazda 3 turbo for 20k miles now and in that time, 2 of the Turanza tires had sidewall bubbles that compromised them. Not to mention, they are just noisy and feel like they have pretty lame grip. They are not confidence-inspiring at all and suck in the cold.

Cons: noisy, lame grip
Vehicle: Mazda 3
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ... 105

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...