Tires BRIDGESTONE or Firestone

BRIDGESTONE Tires

I have run blizzak ws90s. Honestly out of the 3 I feel like blizzak are the best compromise. Snow performance is good. Ice performance is not quite as good as studded obviously but still good.

Pros: best compromise
Cons: ice performance not best
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
JerryKook
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

I have Blizzaks they're amazing. They are also studdless. So they are quiet. I am a serious skier. I have never not made it to the mountain with my Blizzaks.

Pros: amazing, quiet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Got new Weatherpeaks installed and drove through fresh snow and slush today. Hit the brakes and the ABS barely engaged. Handling was great but then again they're new.

Pros: handling was great
Cons: ABS barely engaged
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I had a Mazda 6 that came fitted with Bridgestone Turanza. I got 4 years and 90,000km from those. I then fitted Potenza and got 2.5 years and 32,000km before they were gone.

Pros: long lasting Turanza
Cons: Potenza wore quickly
Vehicle: Mazda 6
Mileage: 32000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires
ka36
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

I worked for Firestone installing tires for a while, and those tires are pretty bad. I guess all budget tires are probably the same, but I wouldn't want those on my car. The number of recalls that went out on those was crazy, almost weekly. They also wear pretty damn fast, and don't grip for shit.

Cons: wear fast, don't grip
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 ... 124

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...