Tires BRIDGESTONE or DEBICA

BRIDGESTONE Tires

I have a 2015 GSX-S750 that I've run Bridgestone T30/31 for many years. Solid dry performance, decent wet grip and long life.

Pros: solid dry performance, long life
Cons: decent wet grip
Vehicle: Suzuki
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I've been running Blizzaks (WS80, then WS90) on the stock wheels on my '18 Sportwagen since new and have loved them.

Pros: have loved them
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I bought the Weatherpeak 2 years ago. They were great tires in messy weather. No complaints at all there. But they wore down very quickly. Like in 25-40k.

Pros: great in messy weather
Cons: wore down quickly
Mileage: 40000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
yngwie98
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

Bought Weatherpeaks instead of CC2 for our Crosstrek, no difference in MPG. They're quieter than the stock Falkens.

Snow traction isn't as good as dedicated winter tires but it's good enough for the winters around here.

Pros: quieter than stock
Cons: snow traction not great
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

If you need dedicated winter tires, best option is to buy a second set of rims and winter specific tires, Blizzaks are a personal fav of mine.

Pros: winter specific tires
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

The problem with LRR tires is they suck at doing the things you need a tire to do, like braking and cornering. I once put a set of Bridgestone Ecopias on a Mazda5... A FWD minivan with 153 Horsepower should not be able to spin the tires all the way through 1st and 2nd gears taking off from a stop sign.

Cons: suck at braking, suck at cornering
Vehicle: Mazda 5
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ... 93

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...