Tires BFGoodrich or Sava

BFGoodrich Tires
roXterra
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Good advice below, I have LTs with K02 but I would get C rated instead if I could get them in same setup I have, tire, rim, raised letters.

Less mass means more mpg on highway. Offroad the softer tires can feel softer too.

Pros: more mpg on highway
Cons: punctured on a stick
Vehicle: Nissan
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
No_Original5693
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I’m running 265/70/17 (123 load) K03 on my 4Runner and I’ve been pleased with washboard performance (2mi of sort on my commute). They do like to chuck rocks more than the AT3W (not sure how the AT4W is). Rain performance has been great here in Maine. Haven’t had enough snow yet

Pros: pleased with performance, great rain
Cons: chuck rocks
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
JackHazzes
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I switched the Kumho Crugens that came with my 2022 Santa Cruz SEL nonturbo with activity to BF Goodrich Trail Terrain, still at 245/60r18 about 2 weeks ago. The Trail Terrain is a lot more quiet, in fact, I can hear the hum of the engine much clearer now. Great in mild snow and ice, never slipped. It also performed very well in the rain and a little puddle, no hydroplaning so far. Cornering is not at good as the Crugen and needed a bit of correction. The ride is almost as comfy as the Crugen, but I can feel the little road imperfections subtly. I averaged 26.8 mpg on the Crugen, the Trail Terrain set me back a dismal 23.9 mpg.

Pros: more quiet, great in snow
Cons: cornering not as good
Vehicle: Hyundai
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

I have bf Goodrich GeForce comp 2 and they are fantastic in the rain. Not sure if they sell a size to fit the stock wheel but 205 45 16 only rubs on hard corners downhill and it’s lowered in coilovers

Pros: fantastic in the rain
Cons: rubs on hard corners
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
CreativeUsername20
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Yeah, keep rotating them and keep the alignment good. My BFG KO2s are holding up very well, having 40k miles on them.

Pros: holding up very well
Mileage: 64000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
cwsand
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 3.5

I’m just about to replace my KO2 265/70r17s. I put them on in 2018 and have 62,000 miles on them. They have been great - just avoid mud but that goes for all AT tires. Over the last year they got louder on highway and wet traction sucks right now due to wear.

Pros: great, long lasting
Cons: loud, bad wet traction
Mileage: 62000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
TrollCannon377
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

I know I'm way late to the party but I'd go with the Falkens, I had a set of KO2s on my TJ and they where an absolute bitch to get balanced and caused a ton of vibration between 60 and 65 mph

Pros: go with Falkens
Cons: hard to balance, vibration
Vehicle: Jeep
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

The BF Goodrich MT/TA 255/75 R17 are the original tires on my JEEP Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon Hard Rock which has only 24,000 easy miles on it. I have never been off road. At 24k miles they are badly worn and cupping and the noise has become unbearable.

Cons: badly worn, unbearable noise
Mileage: 38624 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 36

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...