Tires BFGoodrich or OEM Porsche

BFGoodrich Tires
nomad2284
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.5

The traction is one aspect but proven durability off road is hard to put a value on. K02s have eaten some ugly road.

Pros: proven off-road durability, good traction
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
Genghis-Ron-
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

2k miles in and I love them. 1-1.5mpg decrease from the stock OEM tires.

Pros: love them
Cons: 1-1.5mpg decrease
Vehicle: Toyota
Mileage: 3219 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
cktokm99
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I just put on bfg trial terrain all season and live in New England don’t get much snow.

They have much more grip than the original tyre but I don’t notice a difference in noise which is imprtant to me.

Pros: much more grip
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
edyvw
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.5

But, it is MUCH smoother, still probably best off road of these on/road biased A/T tires. But, compared to Continental, lacks on road performance.

Pros: best off road
Cons: lacks on road performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

BF Goodrich A/T are - IMO - dangerous on wet tarmac. Not bad, dangerous. I have 2 UAZ Hunter cars... On BFG during just 4kkm already had a few very bad slips in curves and a collision, when I could not stop the car in a traffic jam on 2nd gear (ABS grinding like on ice... In may!). Not to mention the previous owner slipped and hit a tree on these. Same cars, same driver. BFG are very bad on wet road and I mean real bad... Dangerous.

Cons: dangerous on wet tarmac, very bad slips, caused collision
Mileage: 4000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 35

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...