Tires BFGoodrich or Nokia

Nokia Tires

We put them on our 2018 XT this year, studless. Been pretty good so far. The -30C we've been getting in Calgary lately though there's still some slip on the hard sheer ice but no way I'd want to try regular all seasons!

Pros: pretty good so far
Cons: some slip on ice
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I have the Ones on my 1997 Toyota Estima Emina and they're great. Nice steering response and like Nokian's other all-season tires, they do great in the wet. I also appreciate the aramid (kevlar) sidewalls.

Pros: nice steering response, great in wet
Vehicle: Toyota Estima
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Nokian One. They are cheaper than top tier tires with the same or better ratings. They have a 80k mile tread wear warranty, reinforced sidewalls and great grip in the rain. I live in the PNW and have had them for only a couple months but I highly recommend.

Pros: great grip in rain
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

Im running BFGoodrich advantage control on my 2016. They are a sister company to Michelin, so you'll be getting the same good quality you normally get with them. When it comes to snow, I'm comfortably able to drive through 5-6 inches of snow and have had zero issues in the rain.

Pros: good quality, zero issues
Vehicle: Honda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
Future_Swimming_9601
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 2.0

I had G-2, G-3 and now G-4. but experiencing dry rot on the G-4's and can't keep them balanced--shimmy at certain speeds even when balanced, and they are getting noisier and noisier--thought I had a wheel hub issue.

Pros: previous models were good
Cons: dry rot, can't balance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 104

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...