Tires BFGoodrich or Nokia

Nokia Tires

Ive got Nokian WRG5s on mine, as we’ve got some pretty serious winter driving where I live, and I’ve been pretty happy with them.

Pros: pretty happy
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
No_Original5693
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I’m running 265/70/17 (123 load) K03 on my 4Runner and I’ve been pleased with washboard performance (2mi of sort on my commute). They do like to chuck rocks more than the AT3W (not sure how the AT4W is). Rain performance has been great here in Maine. Haven’t had enough snow yet

Pros: pleased with performance, great rain
Cons: chuck rocks
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

We have Blizzaks on one vehicle and Nokian Hakkapolita on the other. Of the two, I prefer the Hakkas but that may be more to that I prefer that vehicle more. Either are very good but don’t forget to drive to the conditions.

Pros: very good
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Nokian Hakkapellitas with studs on all 4 of our vehicles. For winters I go premium. Makes a huge difference

Pros: premium, huge difference
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
JackHazzes
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I switched the Kumho Crugens that came with my 2022 Santa Cruz SEL nonturbo with activity to BF Goodrich Trail Terrain, still at 245/60r18 about 2 weeks ago. The Trail Terrain is a lot more quiet, in fact, I can hear the hum of the engine much clearer now. Great in mild snow and ice, never slipped. It also performed very well in the rain and a little puddle, no hydroplaning so far. Cornering is not at good as the Crugen and needed a bit of correction. The ride is almost as comfy as the Crugen, but I can feel the little road imperfections subtly. I averaged 26.8 mpg on the Crugen, the Trail Terrain set me back a dismal 23.9 mpg.

Pros: more quiet, great in snow
Cons: cornering not as good
Vehicle: Hyundai
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
bigtoepfer
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 3.0

Ko2 = great on rocks and most trails. Pretty bad if the trail will get muddy and clog up the tread blocks. <10k miles relatively quiet. 10k-40k loud Nearly indestructible though even with lots of sharp rocks. Neve punctured one. Lots of balancing problems. Thank 4wheelparts for free rotate and balance. AT3W= Similar experience in most terrain. Maybe mildly better on packed snow but id say it's a wash. Quieter over all for highway driving mine have about 30k on them now.

Pros: great on rocks, indestructible
Cons: bad in mud, balancing problems
Mileage: 40000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
Lost_Fig_7453
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 2.0

No experience with the Continentals but I really did not like the Nokians. I bought them because they seemed to be well-reviewed, they were only marginally better than the Nexens in terms of traction yet they were a decent bit louder. Despite having plenty of tread left after 35k miles I replaced them with Michelin Primacy Tour and they’re so much quieter and the traction is much improved. I had a friend who is a frequent passenger in my car comment on how much quieter it was completely unprompted the first time he rode in the car after getting the Michelins. The Nokians were loud from the beginning and traction in wet conditions decreased rapidly as they aged.

Pros: much quieter, traction improved
Cons: louder, traction decreased
Mileage: 56327 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 ... 104

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...