Tires BFGoodrich or Nokia

BFGoodrich Tires
Amos_Dad
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

Ive been running KO2s for years and my most recent set is the KO3. I like them. They handle well on the road amd in the dirt, aren't loud at all, and last a decent amount.

Pros: handle well on road
Cons: aren't loud at all
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
tatecg
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I put these, in this size, on my R1S— they seem great so far (2 weeks). Maybe a little more road noise?

Pros: seem great so far
Cons: little more road noise
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I had them on an 2015 Accord sedan for four+ years(7/8 months per year), fantastic tires unfortunately I cannot attest to snow as I switch over to Hakkapeliitta 9 in Mid November as we have a Winter Tire Law in Quebec Canada. They are very good on the wet, great on dry, not particularly loud and wear relatively well but tire pressure and one good alignment a year is a must in Montreal with the fluctuations in Temperature and pot holes in the spring/summer...

Pros: very good on wet, great on dry
Cons: alignment a must
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
Livithan
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I am a huge fan of my BF Goodrich ko2. The rigid sidewall helps with the rear end sway and load stability and the higher PSI reduces temperature from the sidewall under load as well. They have been excellent on-road, off-road, and snow. The only thing I will say is that at higher pressure in the tire I feel everything on the road.

Pros: excellent on/off road, load stability
Cons: feel everything on road
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
Adept-Sky-1715
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

My wife wanted a tire that was more comfortable, quieter, and had better treadwear than the OEM summer tires. So far, we're really happy with these tires.

Even though there's no acoustic foam like on our OEM tires, they're quieter. They're practically silent up to 50mph but there's a slight hum at freeway speeds. They're not as loud as the OEM Continentals.

They're also much more comfortable than the OEM summer tires. With the Ohlins suspension and OEM Continentals, the Polestar 2 was surprisingly jarring over small bumps on the road. One thing that I noticed was that the Nokian sidewalls seem to be pretty soft/flexible.

Tread life should be solid. Handling/Performance feels like 85% of the OEM tires.

All in all, these aren't track tires. Nor are they the sportiest tires in the UHP All-Season class. But they're a super practical choice for a wide range of coupes and sedans - they should wear well, they're comfortable, and provide enough grip to have fun.

Pros: quieter, more comfortable, good grip
Cons: softer and more vague
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I'm proud I bought Nokian winter tires few years ago. They weren't that expensive, about €75 each considering Continental were something like €120 each.

Pros: good price
Cons: Continental more expensive
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

I had a set and my only complaint was they weren’t very good in mud, other than that they were great.

Pros: great overall performance
Cons: poor in mud
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

For a pickup or heavy vehicle no way, I have Nokians on my 17 Ford F350 can't wait to get them off, still have 50% according to the wear indicator, been driving for over 40 years and they are the worst tires I have ever had. This experience with Nokians has instilled a real dislike for the brand.

Cons: worst tires ever
Vehicle: Ford
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 ... 104

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...