Tires BFGoodrich or LANDSAIL

BFGoodrich Tires
Genghis-Ron-
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

2k miles in and I love them. 1-1.5mpg decrease from the stock OEM tires.

Pros: love them
Cons: 1-1.5mpg decrease
Vehicle: Toyota
Mileage: 3219 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
cktokm99
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I just put on bfg trial terrain all season and live in New England don’t get much snow.

They have much more grip than the original tyre but I don’t notice a difference in noise which is imprtant to me.

Pros: much more grip
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
LANDSAIL Tires

I'm a Landsail CLX-20 fan myself, so I'd recommend getting a set of them. They are significatly cheaper than well known name brands, but they give you a lot of the value.

Pros: good value, cheaper
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
LANDSAIL Tires

Ich fahre seit nun 2 Jahren und vielen Kilometern reifen von landsail, die Dinger kleben förmlich auf der Straße, natürlich ersetzen diese den Winterreifen nicht aber selbst bei guten Winterverhälnisen konnte ich top fahren. Der reifen heißt: Landsail 4-Season2x. Ich bin sehr zufrieden und preislich echt top

Pros: kleben auf der Straße, top bei Winterverhältnissen, sehr zufrieden, preislich top
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

BF Goodrich A/T are - IMO - dangerous on wet tarmac. Not bad, dangerous. I have 2 UAZ Hunter cars... On BFG during just 4kkm already had a few very bad slips in curves and a collision, when I could not stop the car in a traffic jam on 2nd gear (ABS grinding like on ice... In may!). Not to mention the previous owner slipped and hit a tree on these. Same cars, same driver. BFG are very bad on wet road and I mean real bad... Dangerous.

Cons: dangerous on wet tarmac, very bad slips, caused collision
Mileage: 4000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 36

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...