Brake pads TRW or Raybestos

PartReview Score

Rank #15 in ranking

102

4.1

Braking

4.1

Dust

3.7

Noise

3.7

No data

PR Score

Ranking

Votes

Reviews

Average rating

Properties

Car

PartReview Score

Rank #10 in ranking

165

3.9

Braking

3.9

Dust

3.7

Noise

2.8

Owners' choice:

Jeep Compass

Reviews

All

TRW

Raybestos

Raybestos › Brake pads

Significant-Visit328 21 Jan 2026, 10:46

Braking:

Rating 4.0

Yeah, for wipers, it's usually a gradual decline but once they start to go, it's quick; I usually look for any hazing or small spots that don't clear right away, which is a lot more obvious than trying to gauge wear on something like brake pads where you just trust a good brand like raybestos to do its job.

Pros: trust a good brand

Cons: gradual decline

Raybestos › Brake pads

mr_data_lore 20 Jan 2026, 03:01

Braking:

Rating 4.0

This might not be a popular opinion, but I've never had any problems with my OEM pads or rotors. Truck had the original OEM pads and rotors on it when I bought it, when those wore out I put Raybestos ones on and I was definitely not impressed with their performance. I switched back to OEM and have been happy ever since.

Pros: no problems, happy with performance

Cons: not impressed with performance

Vehicle: Toyota Tundra

TRW › Brake pads

exceptional_cabbage 9 Jan 2026, 02:49

Noise:
Dust:

Rating 4.0

If you want comfort, use an OE supplier (TRW, Textar, pagid), if you want more performance at the cost of some added noise/dust, Ferodo/hawk/EBC

Pros: comfort with OE supplier

Cons: noise/dust with performance brands

Raybestos › Brake pads

Gryfth 8 Jan 2026, 16:47

Braking:

Rating 4.0

Raybestos is fine for everyday driving actually, wasn\u2019t aware that\u2019s what you had.

Pros: fine for driving

Raybestos › Brake pads

bingbongfat 5 Jan 2026, 10:27

Braking:

Rating 5.0

I've been using raybestus element 3. Pads and rotors on my Toyotas.

Vehicle: Toyota

TRW › Brake pads

Royal_Cranberry_8419 5 Jan 2026, 08:23

Braking:

Rating 5.0

When I bought one of my cars used I immediately noticee the brakes felt horrible. As in they didnt feel like they wanted to stop. Its almost like when your slowing down and coming up on the car infront you expect your car to slow down faster than it is right now. So you oush down harder and harder and you get maybe 10% more braking. Yeah. Swapped those pads out for some street performance pads. Night and day difference. The brakes actually work now. Good initial bite and good modulation.

Pros: Good initial bite

Cons: brakes felt horrible

Raybestos › Brake pads

AW-SOM-O 17 Dec 2025, 03:09

Rating 4.0

I would look at Raybestos, Wagner, Bendix, Bosch, or any of the major parts store brands.

Pros: major parts store brands

Cons: skimp on brake pads

Raybestos › Brake pads

Lxiflyby 19 Jan 2026, 14:15

Braking:

Rating 3.0

Raybestoes are okay

Pros: okay

Raybestos › Brake pads

Impossible-Use6521 3 Jan 2026, 01:37

Braking:

Rating 3.0

Over 600 per axle for brakes seems high. I just ordered Raybestos pads and rotors front and back for 250 total from rock. Learning how to fix your car is like paying yourself.

Raybestos › Brake pads

g26okie 19 Jan 2026, 16:28

Braking:

Rating 2.0

I had bad luck with a set of raybestos I put on my Tlx. Vibrations after 3k miles. Rebedded them, vibes again in 3k.

Cons: vibrations after 3k miles

Vehicle: Acura TLX

Mileage: 3000 km

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 14

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Part:

Manufacturer:

Make:

Model:

Generation:

Review tone

Positive Negative Neutral

Reviews found: 0

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake pads Motorcraft has only 4 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake fluid OEM Subaru has only 2 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake pads Detroit Axle has only 8 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake pads OEM Alfa Romeo got the first review!

The brake caliper OEM BMW got the first review!

The brake pads OEM Infiniti got the first review!

For wiper blades PIAA already 100 reviews.

For battery Energizer already 25 reviews.

In the rating best water pump already 12 brands participate!

In the rating best timing belt already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!

In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!

In the auto rating tires for Subaru Outback already 50 brands participate!

The glow plug Autolite has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The fender OEM Volkswagen has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The brake discs Tesla has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

The brake pads OEM Subaru already has 250 votes!

The engine oil AMSOIL already has 1000 votes!

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

The engine radiator MISHIMOTO already has 300 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

Other comparisons

Brake pads EBC or POWER STOP

Brake pads EBC or Akebono

Brake pads EBC or Hawk Performance

Brake pads Brembo or EBC

Brake pads Akebono or POWER STOP

Brake pads EBC or Ferodo

Brake pads EBC or OEM Volkswagen

Brake pads POWER STOP or Hawk Performance

Show all

Which brake pads to choose — TRW or Raybestos?

If choosing brake pads across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare brake pads across these categories:

Comparison of brake pads TRW and Raybestos

PR Score.
Overall ranking.
Vote balance.
Average rating.
Number of reviews.
Feature ratings.
Car owners’ choice.

Which brake pads are better — Raybestos or TRW?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads Raybestos were overall better than TRW.

TRW received a PR Score of 86 out of 100, and Raybestos scored 80 points.
TRW ranked 15 in the overall ranking, and Raybestos ranked 10.
The average rating is higher for TRW (4.1) than for Raybestos (3.9).
Brake pads TRW have better feature ratings than Raybestos:
- Braking - owners believe, that this property for TRW is better than Raybestos.
- Dust - drivers claim, that by this property TRW does not differ from Raybestos.
- Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for TRW is preferred to Raybestos.

Which brake pads are more popular — TRW or Raybestos?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads Raybestos were overall more popular than TRW.

By vote balance, brake pads Raybestos surpassed TRW:

For TRW, the ratio of positive (121) to negative (19) votes is 102 votes.
For Raybestos, the ratio of positive (219) to negative (54) votes is 165 votes.

By number of reviews, brake pads Raybestos surpassed TRW:

For brake pads TRW there are 44 reviews: 35 positive, 8 neutral, 1 negative.
For brake pads Raybestos there are 87 reviews: 65 positive, 12 neutral, 10 negative.

Which brake pads do car owners prefer — TRW or Raybestos?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, brake pads Raybestos led more car-specific ratings than TRW:

Raybestos are chosen by owners of cars such as: Jeep Compass, and others.

Brake pads TRW have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.

Other comparisons of brake pads

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of brake pads TRW with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.

Also available: comparisons of brake pads Raybestos with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.

You can also see who is better among other brake pads manufacturers: EBC or POWER STOP, EBC or Akebono, EBC or Hawk Performance, Brembo or EBC, Akebono or POWER STOP.