Brake pads Akebono or TRW

Akebono Brake pads

Just replaced pads on our 2018 NX300 w/80k miles on the factory pads. Used Akebono pads and Advic rotors.

Pros: long lasting factory pads
Vehicle: Lexus
Mileage: 80000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Akebono Brake pads
StashMyComics
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 5.0

Akebono makes many oem brakes, including for some toyota/lexus models. Have used them without issues for many years.

Pros: no issues, reliable
Vehicle: Lexus
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Akebono Brake pads

Used to swear by Akebono pads and they never let me down. For rotors I'd go with Centric or Raybestos - they're solid without breaking the bank. Skip the cheap stuff from AutoZone though, learned that lesson the hard way

Pros: reliable, solid performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Akebono Brake pads
rkmask51
  • Braking:
Rating 5.0

I hated the OEM rotors and pads. I replaced all 4 rotors and pads with a centric premium rotor with akebono pads. This was done at 35K miles, and now at 71K miles, I am very glad I did it and the new pads have held up well.

Pros: new pads held up well
Cons: hated OEM rotors and pads
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 56327 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Akebono Brake pads
YelloSmake
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

I run Akebono pads on my Lexus/Toyota cars. They are ceramic, so there may be less bite than a semi-metallic pad, but they are very low dust and last long.

Pros: very low dust, last long
Cons: less bite
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Akebono Brake pads
realKevinNash
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
Rating 3.0

I got what I was lead to believe were quality pads and rotors Akebono pads, dont remember the rotors.

Ever since i've had noise from my braking system. Took it in to get looked at and was told it was fine, just the noise was from not replacing the rotors.

Pros: quality pads
Cons: noise from braking
Vehicle: Nissan Maxima
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Akebono Brake pads
Royal_Cranberry_8419
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 2.0

I used the akebono asp and pro act on my lexus. They were pretty crap for the application. They lacked any bite and you had to really push to get any decent braking. But thats probably ceramic pads in general. They were very low dust through and quiet. Switched to a forza street performance pad and night and day difference and the pad was still low dust, low wear and virtually silent. Just hard to get them.

Pros: low dust, quiet, low wear
Cons: lacked bite, poor braking
Vehicle: Lexus
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 48

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons

Which brake pads to choose — Akebono or TRW?

If choosing brake pads across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare brake pads across these categories:

Comparison of brake pads Akebono and TRW
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which brake pads are better — TRW or Akebono?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads Akebono were overall better than TRW.

  1. Akebono received a PR Score of 87 out of 100, and TRW scored 86 points.
  2. Akebono ranked 3 in the overall ranking, and TRW ranked 15.
  3. The average rating is higher for Akebono (4.2) than for TRW (4.1).
  4. Brake pads Akebono have better feature ratings than TRW:
    • Braking - owners believe, that by this property Akebono does not differ from TRW.
    • Dust - drivers claim, that this property for Akebono is outperforms TRW.
    • Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for Akebono is preferred to TRW.

Which brake pads are more popular — Akebono or TRW?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads Akebono were overall more popular than TRW.

By vote balance, brake pads Akebono surpassed TRW:

  • For Akebono, the ratio of positive (1187) to negative (164) votes is 1023 votes.
  • For TRW, the ratio of positive (121) to negative (19) votes is 102 votes.

By number of reviews, brake pads Akebono surpassed TRW:

  • For brake pads Akebono there are 436 reviews: 367 positive, 43 neutral, 26 negative.
  • For brake pads TRW there are 44 reviews: 35 positive, 8 neutral, 1 negative.

Which brake pads do car owners prefer — Akebono or TRW?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, brake pads Akebono led more car-specific ratings than TRW:

Akebono are chosen by owners of cars such as: Honda Civic, Hyundai Santa Fe, Infiniti G, Lexus LS, Audi Q5, Audi S4, Lexus RX, Subaru Outback, Toyota Avalon, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Tundra, and others.

Brake pads TRW have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.

Other comparisons of brake pads

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of brake pads Akebono with: EBC, POWER STOP, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech, Mintex.

Also available: comparisons of brake pads TRW with: EBC, POWER STOP, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech, Mintex.

You can also see who is better among other brake pads manufacturers: EBC or POWER STOP, EBC or Akebono, EBC or Hawk Performance, Brembo or EBC, Akebono or POWER STOP.

Loading...