Brake pads TRW or OEM KIA

TRW Brake pads
phulton
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.5

I’ll be switching to TRW Ultra pads when the time comes. All reviews say they are similar in performance to OEM without the dust.

Pros: similar to OEM, low dust
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
TRW Brake pads

I use TRW brake pads (just checked, articles are GDB3592 for front, GDB2172 for back). They make quite a lot of brake dust during spirited driving, but that’s not a big deal for me (IMO more brake dust = less wear on brake discs).

Pros: less disc wear
Cons: lots of brake dust
Vehicle: Mazda 3
Part number: GDB3592, GDB2172
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
TRW Brake pads
_Nihilism
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

I can recommend TRW „DTEC“ pads. Almost no brake dust, no squeaking, good bite on the breaks. The only trade of is that when it’s really cold or raining and you drive on the highway for a long time, the first half of a second when you break again the performance is weak. That’s what I experienced. I never had this with the original pads in winter time or heavy rain.

Pros: no dust, no squeaking
Cons: weak performance in cold/rain
Part number: DTEC
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
TRW Brake pads
SourceVG
  • Braking:
Rating 4.5

I went with TRW Ultra ceramic pads and Zimmerman rotors from FCP Euro for my S90. It was a big upgrade from OEM in my experience.

Pros: big upgrade from OEM
Vehicle: Volvo S90
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
TRW Brake pads
RichardGG24
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 3.5

I currently have TRW NAO pads and zimmerman rotors all around on my S60, very dusty but bites harder than ceramic, especially when they are cold.

Pros: strong cold braking
Cons: very dusty
Vehicle: Volvo S60
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...