Brake pads Textar or Raybestos

Raybestos Brake pads

Yeah, for wipers, it's usually a gradual decline but once they start to go, it's quick; I usually look for any hazing or small spots that don't clear right away, which is a lot more obvious than trying to gauge wear on something like brake pads where you just trust a good brand like raybestos to do its job.

Pros: trust a good brand
Cons: gradual decline
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Raybestos Brake pads

This might not be a popular opinion, but I've never had any problems with my OEM pads or rotors. Truck had the original OEM pads and rotors on it when I bought it, when those wore out I put Raybestos ones on and I was definitely not impressed with their performance. I switched back to OEM and have been happy ever since.

Pros: no problems, happy with performance
Cons: not impressed with performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Raybestos Brake pads
g26okie
  • Braking:
Rating 2.0

I had bad luck with a set of raybestos I put on my Tlx. Vibrations after 3k miles. Rebedded them, vibes again in 3k.

Cons: vibrations after 3k miles
Vehicle: Acura TLX
Mileage: 3000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 14

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons

Which brake pads to choose — Textar or Raybestos?

If choosing brake pads across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare brake pads across these categories:

Comparison of brake pads Textar and Raybestos
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which brake pads are better — Raybestos or Textar?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads Raybestos were overall better than Textar.

  1. Textar received a PR Score of 74 out of 100, and Raybestos scored 80 points.
  2. Textar ranked 22 in the overall ranking, and Raybestos ranked 10.
  3. The average rating is higher for Raybestos (3.9) than for Textar (3.8).
  4. Brake pads Raybestos have better feature ratings than Textar:
    • Dust - owners believe, that this property for Raybestos is better than Textar.
    • Braking - drivers claim, that this property for Textar is outperforms Raybestos.
    • Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for Textar is preferred to Raybestos.

Which brake pads are more popular — Textar or Raybestos?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads Raybestos were overall more popular than Textar.

By vote balance, brake pads Raybestos surpassed Textar:

  • For Textar, the ratio of positive (104) to negative (35) votes is 69 votes.
  • For Raybestos, the ratio of positive (219) to negative (54) votes is 165 votes.

By number of reviews, brake pads Raybestos surpassed Textar:

Which brake pads do car owners prefer — Textar or Raybestos?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, brake pads Raybestos led more car-specific ratings than Textar:

Raybestos are chosen by owners of cars such as: Jeep Compass, and others.

Brake pads Textar have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.

Other comparisons of brake pads

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of brake pads Textar with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.

Also available: comparisons of brake pads Raybestos with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.

You can also see who is better among other brake pads manufacturers: EBC or POWER STOP, EBC or Akebono, EBC or Hawk Performance, Brembo or EBC, Akebono or POWER STOP.

Loading...