Brake pads Carbotech or Raybestos

Carbotech Brake pads
pissjugman
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

I run carbotech 12/10 on my C5. Streetable but messy. I only really drive to track, on track, then home. Probably drive 100 street/leisure miles a year, but after 2 track days on this setup (wilwood aero6 in front) I’m very happy with the setup.

Pros: streetable, very happy
Cons: messy
Vehicle: Chevrolet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Carbotech Brake pads

I'm liking the Carbotech 1521 pads for their better heat tolerance and modulation over OEM pads, though I feel light initial bite is slightly less.

Pros: better heat tolerance, good modulation
Cons: light initial bite
Vehicle: Acura Integra
Part number: 1521
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Carbotech Brake pads
maxcbrdriver
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

Low dust brake pads. On my F87, I use Carbotech 1521. Slight decrease in initial brake bite, significant decrease in dust.

Pros: significant decrease in dust
Cons: slight decrease in bite
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Carbotech Brake pads

I track a WRX and have used XP12's in the front and XP10's in the rear. They work very well. IMO Carbotechs are one of the best for the track

Pros: work very well, one of the best
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Raybestos Brake pads

I have the Raybestos EHT on my ol' Camry and Avalon. They lack longevity and will pulse toward then end of their usable life. The quality control has slipped a little of the years. You might have to file fit them(as with any pad). I'd say that they won't tolerate a hack installer. My EHT stopped better than my Akeboner proacts.

Pros: better stopping power (than Akebono)
Cons: lack longevity, pulse near end of life, slipped quality control, difficult installation
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 19

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...