Brake pads ATE or Hawk Performance

Hawk Performance Brake pads
JorJorBinks123
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 5.0

Hawk Street 5.0 have been better at stopping than stock, lasted over 25k miles with about 60% left, and have dramatically less dusting than stock.

Pros: better stopping, less dusting
Mileage: 40233 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads

I upgraded to motul 600 and hawk hp+ for my first track day. Both held up very well for my first day. I plan to use better pads next time though for similar reasons, the hp+ will overheat but they are gonna be better than stock. There's still a ton of pad life on them after my 1 track day.

Pros: held up well, better than stock
Cons: overheat
Vehicle: Subaru BRZ
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
gregn8r1
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 3.5

I've used hawk hp+ all last year and my first event of this year; they do serve as a pretty good intermediate pad, if I were you I'd go after something similar to it or slightly more track-oriented, but as I understand it the "HPS" pads are not designed for track use, more of just a capable street pad. The HP+ feel great for street driving, but be aware that they do create a fuckton of dust, and oftentimes they squeal like a school bus as you come to a stop. On track, I'd say they do fine for a beginner. I tend to brake on the early side and not as hard as I could, it's an area where I could certainly improve. I have noticed some brake fade at my most recent event, and for that reason I will be installing some G-loc r8's tomorrow, with a backup set of R12's for the front.

Pros: good for street driving
Cons: lots of dust, squealing, brake fade
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... 46

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...