Brake pads ATE or Centric

Centric Brake pads
sweet_s8n
  • Braking:
Rating 4.0

If my customers choose aftermarket, I always get

380mm centric high carbon rotors

Centric posi-quiet ceramic brakes.

The centric rotors are the absolute best bang for your buck.

I find paid results in comebacks, and oddly enough I get a lot of comebacks when I use brembo brake pads and rotors (they are 100% a different formulation than the land rover brembo OEM spec)

Pros: best bang for buck
Cons: comebacks
Vehicle: Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
ATE Brake pads
adistantrumble
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 5.0

I used ATE ceramic pads on my mk7 pp and so far they are great. Barely any dust, no noticeable wear on the rotors after 3k miles, and no extra pedal pressure required.

Pros: low dust, no rotor wear
Mileage: 3000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Centric Brake pads
tyttuutface
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
Rating 3.0

I've had Centric pads and rotors on the back (90944519) for 5 years and 40,000 miles. They're ok, but they're much noisier than OEM and tend to grab/groan at very low speed.

Pros: ok performance, long lasting
Cons: noisy, grabby at low speed
Mileage: 40000 km
Part number: 90944519
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
ATE Brake pads

Brakes feel fine when driving, but after they cool and I go out again, the pedal feels spongey. A few hard stabs and it returns to normal, until I come in and let it cool. No fade while driving, and pads survived despite having been on the car for over 2 years of road use, although they need replacing now really.

Pros: good braking while driving
Cons: spongey pedal when cool
Part number: TYP 200
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...