Brake pads ATE or Bendix

Bendix Brake pads
_hazey__
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

I’ve ran the Bendix GCT pads in my daily for years.

Minimal dust and good lifespan, and they work as they should.

I’d prefer them over the likes of Bosch and Protex.

Pros: good lifespan, minimal dust
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Bendix Brake pads

Regular DBA's (street model?) i was getting 40k kms, the Bendix heavy duty's i was getting nearly double that. Never had an issue with them.

Pros: nearly double lifespan
Mileage: 40000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
ATE Brake pads

If you’ve still got UFO fronts the part number for pads is ATE 602847 (13.0460-2847.2)

Pros: UFO front pads
Vehicle: Audi 200
Part number: ATE 602847 (13.0460-2847.2)
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Bendix Brake pads
AWAKENEDTEMPEST
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

Bendix premium pads will be fine paired with better rotors you will get a good performance increase , you can look into other brands etc but again no real point in going to far on pads unless its a track car all your doing is 3x the price for very small gain and sometimes a loss as normal street driving will not put enough heat into the pads to get them to operational temp making it dangerous for normal use, also excess brake dust and annoying squeal

Pros: good performance increase
Cons: excess brake dust, annoying squeal
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Bendix Brake pads
armageddhonn
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
Rating 3.0

Bendix gets the job done for its cheap price. May mannotice ka lang na noise when braking from time to time but still walang slippage whatsoever.

Pros: cheap price, gets job done
Cons: noise when braking
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 12

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...