Tires

Owner reviews for tires

Manufacturers
BRIDGESTONE Tires

The MZ-01s have served me very well in every aspect (never have been stuck, and I'm in a notoriously awful snow car) but dry driving, where they are incredibly squirmy (and now, with worn tread, dangerous in the wet).

Pros: served very well
Cons: squirmy on dry roads
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
NITTO Tires

I had Nitto NeoGen's on my Volvo s40 and I loved them. They kept tread for almost 2 years and were sticky on dry roads. Not bad in wet either.

Pros: sticky on dry roads, kept tread
Cons: not bad in wet
Vehicle: Volvo S40
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
NITTO Tires
yallagli
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

neogens are great i had a set on my is300 handle very good,softer sidewall compared to your bridgestones but noise extremely low,because of the softer sidewall handling might suffer a tad ,you might not notice it though.tire wear is awesome if you are lowered.inner treadpattern is designed for lowered cars to reduce wear.

Pros: handle very good, noise low
Cons: softer sidewall, handling suffer
Vehicle: Lexus
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
NOVAdub
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I had them in 245 40 17 on my GTI. I thought they were great! A little loud, but they are cheap tires so I didnt care. I used them as track tires and they wear like iron, and grip very well once hot.

Pros: grip very well, wear like iron
Cons: a little loud
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

On a subject unrelated to load ratings, the Michelin HX MXM4 are, well, to be brutally honest - they are total rubbish. Expect to have borderline dangerous hydroplaning performance when the tires get to 6/32nds and less. Wet traction will be very poor when the tires get below 4/32nds or so.

Cons: dangerous hydroplaning, poor wet traction
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review about tires

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Loading...