Jeep Grand Cherokee parts reviews

56
Parts
5
MOPAR Radiator hose

The support clip comes already attached to the Mopar hose, just like the hose clamps, and definitely should not be breaking within a year.

Pros: support clip attached, durable
Vehicle: Jeep Grand Cherokee
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Denso Engine radiator

I got a Denso for my 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.7L V8 and it has been fantastic, great quality and in good shape upon delivery. Vehicle ran 5-7°F cooler than before the radiator leak that initiated the replacement

Pros: fantastic quality, good shape on delivery, ran cooler
Vehicle: Jeep Grand Cherokee
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
LIQUI MOLY Engine flush
Dwilliamson5002
  • Idle smoothness:
  • Drain appearance:
Rating 4.0

I have used the Engine Flush, Ceratec, the more “normal” liqui Moly oil, and now the Molygen with no additives. When I did the Engine Flush with new cheap oil it did come out extra nasty looking. When I filled it up with Ceratec and normal Liqui Moly oil it did seem to run better and get a bit extra MPG. I use the Molygen 5w-40 for my normal yearly oil changes and no issues. I do have a 1995 ZJ with the 5.2. It’s not miracle stuff but it high quality and does appear to do what it advertises. At least in my application!

Pros: high quality, extra MPG
Cons: not miracle stuff
Vehicle: Jeep Grand Cherokee
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nissens Engine radiator
1TONcherk
  • Overheating:
Rating 5.0

I just looked on rockauto. Buy the Nissens 61033. HD cooling radiator. They are an OEM manufacturer. And it’s only $154. Fraction of the cost of Mopar, and the same quality.

Pros: OEM quality, good value
Vehicle: Jeep Grand Cherokee
Part number: 61033
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires
F30N55
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

I had them on my excursion and while they do ride nice and look cool they will be a hit on mpg, as all AT tires will. And this is where you have to be honest with yourself, we all want to pretend that we take our SUV, off-road, and have adventures with it but, if I’m being real with myself, 95% of its time on road and that other 5% of the time is not a trail that would require an aggressive tire. I saw a decrease of 15% on both of the SUVs I traded a highway oriented tire for an AT tire. And in all honesty it’s definitely not worth that fuel economy loss. Yeah sure they look cool but now in my jeep grand Cherokee V6, I struggle to get 21 miles per gallon on the highway when on the OE tires I could easily get 25. That really adds up to a lot of Extra fuel

Pros: ride nice, look cool
Cons: hit on mpg
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
Shockwave179
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Hope you have a better experience with the Outpost AT’s than I did. Just pulled them off my WK2 Grand Cherokee and disposed of them after 15K. Either way had substantial cracking and dry-rotting in-between treadblocks and violent shaking that went away with new Destination AT2’s.

Cons: cracking and dry-rotting, violent shaking
Mileage: 15000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Loading...