Tires YOKOHAMA or Vredestein

YOKOHAMA Tires

I currently run the Geolandar G015 on my MJ. Have also had them on previous vehicles as well. Work well, no issues.

Pros: work well, no issues
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
dbsqls
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I've run 200TW AD09s for 30,000 miles and they're just barely beyond half tread in the rear. by far the longest lasting 200TW I've come across.

Pros: longest lasting 200TW
Vehicle: Nissan
Mileage: 48280 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Vredestein Tires

The only "all season" I've ever used and thought was good was the Vredestein Quatrac Pros, had those on a 2016 Jetta sport and even guy that installed them asked if they were snow tires. But those tires kicked ass, and were 3 peak rated

Pros: kicked ass, 3 peak rated
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

I'm personally a fan of the Yokohama Geolander AT G105. It's literally the only tire I've bought for the last decade and a half and gets around just fine in Iowa winters.

Pros: gets around fine
Part number: G105
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Vredestein Tires
Plumber1551
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.5

Vredestein, been using them on my Inty for a year now, good grip. You just need to be careful as they are prone to puncture easily due to them being soft compound.

Pros: good grip
Cons: prone to puncture
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Today was my first drive into work on the new Yokohama YK-GTX tires. I normally average just over 5mi/kw, today it was just over 4mi/kw. I expected some range hit with new tires, but this seems a bit much. Is this expected, or is their arbitrary range scoring complete garbage?

Cons: significant range hit, lower efficiency than expected
Vehicle: Nissan Leaf
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 84

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...