Tires YOKOHAMA or SUMITOMO

YOKOHAMA Tires

I got Yokohama Avids at 102k, now the van is at 130k and they still look brand new so I highly recommend Yokohamas.

Pros: look brand new
Cons: Bridgestone Ecopias don't last
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
DragoonHimself
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I went with the Yokohama Avid Ascend GTs. Very similar tire just higher quality than the stock. Replaced my stock Avid GTs at 46k. Up to 58k now and I can say I like them.

Pros: higher quality than stock
Vehicle: Subaru
Mileage: 46000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
eniadcorlet
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I have my second set of Yokohama Geolanders GO15s on my '14. The first set had inconsistent tire wear because I let them go without rotation a little too long. I replaced them at 50k. If they had worn evenly I feel I could have gotten the full 65k out of them.

The road noise and mileage are just as good as the Continentals that came stock on mine. I have that little extra grip on the gravel and dirt back roads.

Pros: extra grip, gravel and dirt
Cons: inconsistent tire wear
Vehicle: Subaru
Mileage: 50000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
SUMITOMO Tires

Falken’s parent company sumitomo makes the encounter AT with similar performance for much cheaper, it’s what I’m running currently and they’re great

Pros: great performance, much cheaper
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Only tires I’ve ever had a blow out on are Yokohamas. My falken wild peaks have been great

Pros: falken wild peaks great
Cons: blow out on Yokohamas
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 ... 63

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...