Tires YOKOHAMA or Nokia

YOKOHAMA Tires

Yokohama is your best bang for the buck on the list. You are never going to be mad about going with the Michelins though.

Pros: best bang for buck
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
throwaway007676
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

I just took off a set of Nokians due to getting dry. They were rated for 50k miles, I had 85k on them and they still had 6-7/32 of tread left. Never a traction issue even in snow and ice, even in weather where I had no business being out there with a front wheel drive vehicle. So they checked all the boxes for me. Quiet with good traction, extra load on many models and a great overall tire.

Pros: quiet, good traction
Cons: getting dry
Mileage: 85000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Wife's focus had the yokohoma blue earth gt, they provided good grip wet or dry....managed to outrun essex police with them on when it was stolen as well.

Pros: good grip wet or dry
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

As far as tyres go, I swear by Yokohama’s.

They can be a little soft and they don’t last forever but I’ve never found the limit of grip and I have a highly modified car and drive like I stole it.

Pros: never found grip limit
Cons: little soft, don't last
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Cheap versus branded - branded will be better everytime. In a small car with little brakes you want the best contact possible.

Pros: branded better everytime
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Check out the Nokian Tyre One. It has Aramid sidewalls, low rolling resistance, and 80k mileage warranty.

Pros: Aramid sidewalls, low rolling resistance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 ... 125

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...