Tires YOKOHAMA or Nokia

YOKOHAMA Tires

Muy buenas , tuve 4 en otro auto y le hice algo de 78.000 km , las cambie porque se habían resecado, pero todavía estaban 1mm más o menos arriba de la marca .

Pros: 78.000 km
Cons: se habían resecado
Mileage: 78000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

I really liked the Yokohama Advan’s for the money and the Continental extreme Contacts for their rain grooves and their performance exceeds a Ps4s (on my car anyway)

Pros: good for the money
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
tatecg
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I put these, in this size, on my R1S— they seem great so far (2 weeks). Maybe a little more road noise?

Pros: seem great so far
Cons: little more road noise
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
spleee
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

I had Nokian WRG2s on a car once in the summer. Technically an all-season, but a very very soft all-season. The only thing to note was that under hard braking/cornering they would get squirrelly since the rubber was so soft.

Pros: good traction in rain
Cons: squirrelly under hard braking
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
REDPORKPIE
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 2.0

I waffled between the Yokohama Geolander GO15's and the MS2s. Started with the Yokos and my mileage dropped, was stiffer over bumps, but was a tank in the messy snow we got before Xmas. Swapped them out for the MS2 under the 30 day satisfaction warranty, and I wish I hadn't.

Pros: tank in messy snow
Cons: mileage dropped, stiffer
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 ... 125

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...