Tires YOKOHAMA or Nokia

YOKOHAMA Tires

I'm on my 3rd season on mine with about 60 runs and the same 60 second course a season and I just put in my best performance last month.

Pros: long lasting, best performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Yoks are fast asf. Between the yoks and my new years resolution of "don't be a bitch" I picked up something like 2 seconds over last year.

Here's how my tires look after this season. This is \~75-80 runs total on a 60s course on concrete. There's still meat on the bone, but I don't think there's another 80 left. I'll be buying more tires by the middle of next season at the latest.

Pros: fast, improved performance
Cons: wear quickly
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I\u2019ve run studded Nokians exclusively now for years. Never going back. What you give up in dry traction you more that make up for on those super hard packed icy days. Especially if you\u2019re running on the highways frequently.

Pros: good on icy days
Cons: less dry traction
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Studded all the way! Had Hakkas on my RAV4 and they made such a difference. They can save your life on black ice.

Pros: made such a difference
Cons: slide on dry asphalt
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

I’ve used both Yoko Geolanders and Nokian Outpost APT on my 2020 & 2022 OBXT and Nokians are better in rain & snow, and less weight.

Pros: better in rain and snow
Cons: more weight
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

17 years ago (approx) got Nokian Hakkpellita P2s winter tires - only good for #1 season 6k miles I think - #2 the tires were notably poorer (no good)

Pros: good for first season
Cons: poorer after first season
Mileage: 9656 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 ... 125

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...