Tires YOKOHAMA or NANKANG

YOKOHAMA Tires

S.Drives NO QUESTION!!! I have had both. . . I will NEVER run those garbage falkens again. im running 195/40 16's on my 9's as we speak and they are 100% exactly what I have been looking for in a tire. the falkens were 100% opposite.

Pros: exactly what I have been looking for
Cons: falkens suck in EVERY way
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

From personal expierence, the s.drives are a better tire, stretch slightly less but are a far better tire. the 512s are just good for stretching and thats about it.

Pros: better tire
Cons: stretch slightly less
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
NANKANG Tires

i have ns-ii's and love them. definitely a small tire, but easy to stretch

Pros: love them, easy to stretch
Cons: small tire
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
koston.
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

A little spendier, but absolutely love my Yokohama S.Drives in 205/50/15. Best tires I've driven, hands down. They outperform the Dunlops in every condition, are queiter and stiffer sidewalls, don't squeal etc...

Pros: best tires, quieter
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
Froster
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.5

I just picked up a set of Yokohama TRZ's for my wifes Golf, as they seemed to be a good all-around choice. She's had them a couple weeks now and they have been great. They feel great in the dry and in the wet, and are much quieter than the OEM Goodyears that they replaced.

Pros: feel great in dry, wet
Cons: require more frequent replacement
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
nickthaskater
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I like Yokohama's approach: In regards to handling, the tires were not destined for track duty, so we experienced a level of performance that was slightly above the standard OE tire on most modern passenger vehicles. A few of us did the sentiment that the tire did improve its ability to stay planted after a few hot laps, which would give credence to Yokohama\u2019s claim that the special compound will change its handling characteristics for the better when driven aggressively.

Pros: improved ability to stay planted
Cons: not destined for track duty
Vehicle: MINI
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
NANKANG Tires

I've used em a couple different times and never had a problem. They're pretty good tires for stretching too.

Pros: no problems, good for stretching
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
NANKANG Tires
NJbean89MK5
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I've got Nankang's and i've had them for two years now (only runnin them in the summer)...They were cheap n i was broke so they were my choice :laugh: Haven't had a problem with them yet:thumbup:

Pros: no problems, cheap
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

I am currently running some Yokohama Avid H4s, I have not been very impressed with them dry road handleing is nice however, snow and water is another story. I only got close to 35k out of these tires and I am looking for something that handles the same if not better and will most importantly give me better tread wear.

Pros: nice dry road handling
Cons: poor snow and water
Mileage: 35000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
Widman
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 2.0

I would suggest staying away from the Yokohama Advan ST. I have the 285-14-19s on my egg and while a great handling and traction tire, after 7K miles they are cupping and I get a low speed noise and vibration to the point that at 8K I am replacing them

Pros: great handling, good traction
Cons: cupping, low speed noise
Mileage: 7000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 ... 70

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...