Tires YOKOHAMA or NANKANG

NANKANG Tires
banjozoo
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I’ve used Nankang plenty of times on my older cars, they were fine. Drove fine in wet, drove fine in dry, no louder than any other tires.

Pros: drove fine in wet
Cons: no emergency braking situations
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
Joestac
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I've had the At3s on my '24 OBW for almost 6000 and they are great. Ride just like the stock Yokohama Geolander. Gas mileage didn't suffer, and they are great off road.

Pros: great off road, good ride
Mileage: 9656 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
NANKANG Tires

I think it really depends on the car. A fresh set of 13” AR-1 will last 2000-3000km on track on my dad’s Caterham.

Pros: last 2000-3000km on track
Mileage: 2500 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Replaced with Yokohama Geolandars AT XD (GO17). Decent in the snow, and I feel as though they're better than KO2's/AT3s (owned both).

Pros: decent in the snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Just replaced mine at a little over 25,000 miles. From other posters I knew it was coming sooner rather than later. I ended up putting Yokohama Geolander A/Ts on

Cons: coming sooner
Mileage: 25000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Soooo yes and no. I live in Fairbanks, AK and they honestly did pretty decent for deep snow HOWEVER once it went -40°F and that snow slowly turned into hardpack I instantly swapped them out for Falken AT Trails. Although not as good as a dedicated winter tire they did WAYYYY better than the Avid GTs which almost lead me into a few close calls since THEY HAD ABSOLUTELY 0 TRACTION

Pros: pretty decent for snow
Cons: absolutely 0 traction
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 ... 70

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...