Tires YOKOHAMA or Kumho

YOKOHAMA Tires
topherdrives
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I would seriously consider the Yokohama Geolandar x-cv. I replaced the crap falkens around 31k miles, have about 22k on the yokos and they are fantastic. They also still look and drive new, probably will get 50-60k out of them. They ride very smooth

Pros: ride very smooth, look new
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 31000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
OneBetter6909
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I have a set on my 2500 and a set on the Subaru ascent. Good tires and wearing great

Pros: good tires, wearing great
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

I have had mixed experience with Kumho. Had a set of Ecsta PA51 that were great. No issues and lasted a long time.

Pros: great, no issues
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
MooseKnuckleds
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

I have around 20,000km (12,000mi) on my Kumho tires 2024 hybrid 20"), they are around 60% life, but I never go down to the wear bars. So call them half gone. I'll expect to get about 26,000ish miles.

I tow semi frequently but am otherwise easy on my tires - no hard launches, no high speed hard cornering. Rotate them about every 10,000km as it works out to swap my winter wheels on.

Pros: expected good lifespan
Cons: observed wear rate
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

U can stretch em up to 250....won't be ideal performance...but i pushed a set to 265 before the treads seperated.

Pros: extended use possible
Cons: performance degrades, treads separated
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 96

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...