Tires YOKOHAMA or Kumho

YOKOHAMA Tires

S.Drives NO QUESTION!!! I have had both. . . I will NEVER run those garbage falkens again. im running 195/40 16's on my 9's as we speak and they are 100% exactly what I have been looking for in a tire. the falkens were 100% opposite.

Pros: exactly what I have been looking for
Cons: falkens suck in EVERY way
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

From personal expierence, the s.drives are a better tire, stretch slightly less but are a far better tire. the 512s are just good for stretching and thats about it.

Pros: better tire
Cons: stretch slightly less
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
koston.
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

A little spendier, but absolutely love my Yokohama S.Drives in 205/50/15. Best tires I've driven, hands down. They outperform the Dunlops in every condition, are queiter and stiffer sidewalls, don't squeal etc...

Pros: best tires, quieter
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
Froster
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.5

I just picked up a set of Yokohama TRZ's for my wifes Golf, as they seemed to be a good all-around choice. She's had them a couple weeks now and they have been great. They feel great in the dry and in the wet, and are much quieter than the OEM Goodyears that they replaced.

Pros: feel great in dry, wet
Cons: require more frequent replacement
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

I have Kumho ASX's on the GTI. Treadlife has been great. I currently have about 43k miles on the set and if the retards aligned my wheels correctly when I had them put on, I would be able to get another 15-20k out of them I'm sure. However, they're starting to develop some pretty bad cupping because of said poor alignment. Not the tire's fault, though. The noise is a little much. I notice it, but it doesn't bother me.

Pros: Treadlife has been great
Cons: noise is a little much
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 68800 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
rjamesohio
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Kumhos are working GREAT on my car.... I have ZERO complaints with them; they look great, and they perform fine in both snow and ice. No issues. Plus they were a lot less than Contis. ANd they RIDE a lot better than Bridgestone Potenza, which wore great but are a bit hard.

Pros: look great, perform fine
Cons: wear out faster
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
syd53
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.5

I have been using the Kumho Road Venture 235/60 R 16 for 20,000 miles now and they are great. They are not even half worn. They are also quiet and do a pretty good job in the snow.

Pros: great, quiet, good in snow
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

From what I can gather, the 195/65 14 I have on there now are fairly stiff. Not as stiff as I'd like though. I still get a little plowing fron the front end on some onramps, but maybe a couple more PSI will help that. Of course, what I have to compare it to are a set of Falken Azenis, so really, there is no comparison.

Pros: fairly stiff
Cons: little plowing
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

I still doubt it's the tires, although they are All season's Yokohama Avid H4S

Pros: all season tires
Cons: doubt it's the tires
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 ... 96

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...