Tires YOKOHAMA or KENDA

YOKOHAMA Tires
factordactyl
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I’ve been running a set of Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 in factory dimensions year round on my 3.6. They perform pretty damn well in the snow, great in the rain, awesome off road, and they’re quiet.

Pros: great in rain, awesome offroad
Cons: not as good as Blizzaks
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
Mothman1893
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Only after 3 months replaced with Yokohama Advan Sport A/S.

Current review on them is:

Dry pavement: A+ (I can take turns like a race driver on bare pavement and still feel safe)

Wet Pavement: B (Only problem I’ve had starting aggressively is on wet pavement with road markings on them, seems good on corners and doesn’t hydroplane on really wet pavement, but loses traction with hard braking on very wet pavement)

Roughish Roads: A- (my car has low clearance and low profile tires but got by easily on FS roads with medium rocks and being careful. It gets the minus because after driving 75 miles on semi rough FS roads and getting back to pavement, I pulled to the side of the highway and had a metal chunk lodge into the sidewall ruining the tire)

Pros: safe on dry pavement
Cons: metal chunk in sidewall
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

After 2 weeks of looking and doing homework. Analysis paralysis? I bought Yokahama YK740 GTX. 225/50/17. So far I like them. I was also looking at the "Continental pro contact" as well but the Yokahama had better ratings. If your into that kinda thing. (I was). The wider tire looks kinda cool too.

Pros: better ratings, looks cool
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
LarsTomasson
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I am now running 235/70R17 Yokohama GEOLANDAR A/T G015, gives the car almost 1" of lift, smooth and quiet on the freeway. They weigh 12# more than the stock 215/65R17 and make the car accelerate slower, but they are great on dirt roads.

Pros: smooth and quiet, great on dirt roads
Cons: accelerate slower, weigh 12# more
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
chris86vw
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I had previous versions on my grand Cherokee (31s) and loved them absolutely unstoppable in the snow. and have the current version on my TJ (\"35s\") and love them as well. Not as aggressive looking as the GY MT/RS I had on for a little while before them but much smoother and quieter.

Pros: smoother and quieter
Cons: not as aggressive looking
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
patrikman
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

I\u2019ve been really really happy with Yokohama Geolandar AT/S on my Forester. I\u2019m on the second set are great in any setting, and extremely quiet and long wearing for how aggressive they are.

Pros: great in any setting, quiet
Cons: weighs 31xx lbs
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

I went with the Yoko Geolanders. They are quieter than the Michelins that they replaced, but my gas mileage has dropped like 5%.

Pros: quieter than Michelins
Cons: gas mileage dropped
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
KENDA Tires
NO_AI
  • Grip:
Rating 1.0

My Scout came from the factory Kenda tires. I am wholly not impressed with them, after 9,000 km they are just starting to scrub in for turning grip. I am also under the understanding that these factory tires are only good for 10,000km, so I will be changing none the less.

The addition of any moisture to the rear wheel, including from dew or fog reduces grip friction into the realm of nonexistence making for a disconcerting riding experience.

Cons: poor grip in moisture
Mileage: 9000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 ... 68

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...