Tires YOKOHAMA or BRIDGESTONE

BRIDGESTONE Tires
cscsc
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

I'll run mine 'till the wheels fall off. It's been relatively trouble free - most all problems were fixed while it was under warranty. Front pads & rotors were replaced twice, latest at 30K. So far, so good, but the rear pads are ready for replacement now - will replace rotors also.

Pros: trouble free, good mileage
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 30000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

For example, Maxxis MA-Z1's cost me $135ea and last about 30,000kms, but the Bridgestone Adrenalin RE001's on my car at the moment can get about 60-80,000kms, but cost $185ea.

Pros: can get 60-80,000kms
Cons: more expensive
Vehicle: Ford Focus
Mileage: 60000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I had the WS-50 on my Miata (came with it) and they were fanfukintastic in snow and ice but lasted about 20,000 miles total before turning into slippy dangerous banana peels while still showing 6/32 remaining.

Pros: fanfukintastic in snow, ice
Cons: slippy dangerous banana peels
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Last winter I made the switch from studded Pirelli Winter Carvings to studless Bridgestone Blizzak WS60s... I was extremely impressed with them. Worked great in the white stuff.

Pros: worked great
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
foundubbedriver
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

i have 19x8's up front and 19x9.5's in the back, 215/35/19 yokohama s.drives all around. i've taken it up to about 135 mph so far and its super smooth.

Pros: super smooth, high speed
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I loved the 960's I had on my mkV GTI. I thought they were a great replacement for the RE050's that came stock on the car. I thought the grip on the dry was very similar between the two, but the 960's were better when the weather got bad--as well as lasting longer.

Pros: great replacement, better grip
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

From what I can gather, the 195/65 14 I have on there now are fairly stiff. Not as stiff as I'd like though. I still get a little plowing fron the front end on some onramps, but maybe a couple more PSI will help that. Of course, what I have to compare it to are a set of Falken Azenis, so really, there is no comparison.

Pros: fairly stiff
Cons: little plowing
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
khaug
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Our egg came with Wranglers. They were so noisy and rode so harshly that I replaced them with Bridgestone Dueler Alenzas at 800 miles. Love the new Bridgestones!

Cons: noisy, rode harshly
Mileage: 800 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...